Social & Economic Factors Education Employment Income Family & Social Support Community Safety Search Policies & Programs

Display All Policies & Programs Contribute Content

Healthy Families America (HFA)

Health Factors: Family & Social Support
Decision Makers: Community Organizations, Healthcare Organizations, Individuals
Evidence Rating: Some Evidence
Population Reach: 1-9% of WI's population
Impact on Disparities: Likely to decrease disparities

Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.

Description

Healthy Families America (HFA) is a home visiting program model designed to work with overburdened families who are at-risk for adverse childhood experiences. Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America, the program is based on 12 Critical Elements operationalized through best practice standards that provide a quality structure while offering flexibility in implementation. HFA services begin prenatally or right after birth and are offered by family support workers for 3 to 5 years (HFA).

Expected Beneficial Outcomes

Improved child well-being
Improved child safety
Improved parenting practices and attitudes

Evidence of Effectiveness

There is some evidence that Healthy Families America (HFA) improves child well-being (CEBCPPN, Harding 2007) as well as parenting practices and attitudes (PPN, LeCroy 2011, Harding 2007). HFA appears less likely to reduce child abuse and neglect (DuMont 2008, Harding 2007, Duggan 2007, LeCroy 2011, CEBC). Flexibility in implementation, inherent in the program's design, is likely to contribute to variable effects. Additional evidence is needed to confirm effects and determine the characteristics of successful programs. 

HFA has been shown to positively affect child well-being and safety (CEBC). Mothers participating in Healthy Families New York (HFNY) are less likely to deliver low birthweight babies than non-participants (PPN). Positive effects on the number of low birthweight babies have also been shown in Virginia, Florida, and Washington DC implementations of HFA (Harding 2007).

Overall, HFNY mothers are less likely to engage in abusive, neglectful, or harsh parenting practices, and more likely to use positive parenting skills than non-participants (PPN). An Arizona-based study finds positive effects on parents' expectations and home safety practices in the short-term only (LeCroy 2011). A multi-state assessment finds variation but concludes that, overall, HFA has a largely positive effect on parenting attitudes and home environments (Harding 2007). 

HFA does not appear to affect the prevalence or frequency of substantiated reports of child abuse and neglect, potentially due to surveillance bias (DuMont 2008, Harding 2007, Duggan 2007). The program has been shown to decrease self-reported cases of abuse and neglect in some circumstances (Harding 2007, DuMont 2008).

Implementation Examples

United States

There are nearly 400 affiliated HFA program sites in 40 States, DC, and the US territories (HFA).

Implementation Resources

HFA - Healthy Families America (HFA). Accessed on June 20, 2012
Webpage: http://www.healthyfamiliesamerica.org/home/index.shtml

Citations - Description

HFA - Healthy Families America (HFA). Accessed on June 20, 2012
Webpage: http://www.healthyfamiliesamerica.org/home/index.shtml

Citations - Evidence

CEBC - California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC). Information and resources for child welfare professionals. Accessed on May 1, 2012
Webpage: http://www.cebc4cw.org/search/by-program-name/
Duggan 2007* - Duggan A, Caldera D, Rodriguez K, et al. Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2007;31(8):801-27. Accessed on June 23, 2012
Webpage: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213407001986
DuMont 2008* - DuMont K, Mitchell-Herzfeld S, Greene R, et al. Healthy families New York (HFNY) randomized trial: Effects on early child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2008;32(3):295-315. Accessed on June 23, 2012
Webpage: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213408000148
Harding 2007* - Harding K, Galano J, Martin J, Huntington L, Schellebach CJ. Healthy Families America effectiveness: A comprehensive review of outcomes. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. 2007;34(1/2):149-79. Accessed on June 23, 2012
Webpage: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J005v34n01_08?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed
LeCroy 2011* - LeCroy CW, Krysik J. Randomized trial of the Healthy Families Arizona home visiting program. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33(10):1761-6. Accessed on June 23, 2012
Webpage: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740911001587
PPN - Promising Practices Network (PPN). On children, families and communities. Accessed on May 7, 2012
Webpage: http://www.promisingpractices.org/programs_evidence.asp

Citations - Implementation Examples

HFA - Healthy Families America (HFA). Accessed on June 20, 2012
Webpage: http://www.healthyfamiliesamerica.org/home/index.shtml

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

Comments from Users about this Policy/Program (Cost, Feasibility, Lessons Learned)

No comments

 

Health Factors

Health Behaviors
Tobacco Use
Diet & Exercise
Alcohol Use
Sexual Activity
Clinical Care
Access to Care
Quality of Care
Social & Economic Factors
Education
Employment
Income
Family & Social Support
Community Safety
Physical Environment
Environmental Quality
Built Environment

Decision Makers

Businesses & Employers
Community Organizations
Government - Local
Government - State
Government - Federal
Healthcare Organizations
Individuals
Schools

Evidence Rating

Level of effectiveness based on a scan of academic literature and key recommendations of leading organizations.

  • Scientifically Supported Numerous studies or systematic review(s) with positive results
  • Some Evidence Research suggests positive impacts; further study may be warranted
  • Expert Opinion Recommended by credible groups*; research evidence limited
  • Insufficient Evidence Evidence limited or unavailable; further study warranted
  • Mixed Evidence Evidence mixed; further study warranted
  • Evidence of Ineffectiveness Research consistently shows program is detrimental or has no effect

Although many policies and programs are recommended by credible groups, we apply the rating ‘expert opinion’ only when policies are recommended but limited scientific evidence of effectiveness is available.

* The American Heritage Dictionary defines credible as 'capable of being believed; plausible.' and 'worthy of confidence; reliable.' To be considered an 'expert recommendation,' policies and programs must be recommended by one or more organizations that are recognized for their impartial expertise in the area of interest and have limited evidence available.

Potential Population Reach

Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).

<1%   20-49%
1-9%   50-99%
10-19%   100%

Potential Population Reach

Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).

<1%   20-49%
1-9%   50-99%
10-19%   100%

Potential Impact on Health Disparities

Likely impact of a given policy or program on racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic or other disparities in Wisconsin based on its characteristics (e.g., target audience, mode of delivery, etc.) and best available evidence related to disparities.

  • Likely to decrease disparities
  • No impact on disparities likely
  • Likely to increase disparities